On 2016-12-03 21:46, Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote: > Hi Cedrik, List > > Yes Cedirk, you are right, there is no difference on accounting, just on > the printing, on this way: > > - Simple invoice, no taxes must be printed, but the taxes are the same > - Commercial invoice, taxes printing is mandatory as a common invoice.
So I do not see why you could not use the same layout. A simple invoice with taxes shown will not make it invalid. > I guess, the main difference is relted to party, no the invoice at itself. > As the information provided and the ER diagram, Party could be categorized > on : > > - Companies, which one just could request for a common or commercial invoice > - No companies, this kinds of partyes couldnt request the common invoice, > just simple invoice I do not understand the point. You just said that both type does exactly the same. > As explained on before, I am using just a difference on the printing, and I > use a extra field like "Invoice document type", then I could choice which > one will be the final printing. However this is no making a real difference > between the parties related, since I could select a non company and use the > common invoice, do you make send? This will be solved by using the same layout. -- Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL Email/Jabber: [email protected] Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/20161204113420.GF71015%40tetsuo.
