Hi Cedrik 2016-12-04 6:34 GMT-05:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:
> On 2016-12-03 21:46, Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote: > > Hi Cedrik, List > > > > Yes Cedirk, you are right, there is no difference on accounting, just on > > the printing, on this way: > > > > - Simple invoice, no taxes must be printed, but the taxes are the same > > - Commercial invoice, taxes printing is mandatory as a common invoice. > > So I do not see why you could not use the same layout. A simple invoice > with taxes shown will not make it invalid. > Yes, I currently using this layout, however I am having some issues, on it > > > I guess, the main difference is relted to party, no the invoice at > itself. > > As the information provided and the ER diagram, Party could be > categorized > > on : > > > > - Companies, which one just could request for a common or commercial > invoice > > - No companies, this kinds of partyes couldnt request the common invoice, > > just simple invoice > > I do not understand the point. You just said that both type does exactly > the same. > Yes, on accounting side is the same behavior, but printing report are different. I have solve that on this way - Giving a sub type [ Boleta, Factura ] with diferent sequences Until here all is ok and work perfectly, the issue is: - There is no restruiction on the use. I mean. - Boletas ( Simple invoice ) must be ussed just for NON Companies ( Parties with no VAT identification ) - Facturas ( Current Invoice ) must be used just for COmpanies ( Parties with VATidentification ) And the generated problems - A lots of mistakes generated for the final users since there is no a restriction for Parties * Simple invoices generated for Companies that must be nulled later * Comercial invoiced generated for Non COmpanies I need to fins a way on the tryton layout in order to restrict: - Parties must have one of this identifiers as unique and main identifier: CODE| Description ================================== * 0 | DOC.TRIB.NO.DOM.SIN.RUC * 1 | DOC. NACIONAL DE IDENTIDAD * 4 | CARNET DE EXTRANJERIA * 6 | REG. UNICO DE CONTRIBUYENTES * 7 | PASAPORTE * A | CED. DIPLOMATICA DE IDENTIDAD - Based on the before point, commercial or current invoice must be generated just for customer parties with Code 6 ( Companies ) other wise, just simple invoice - That codification must be part of the document party and a combination with the number of the document. I must be suing idetifiers, however identifiers are on a many to many relation ship, I could add more than one identifier to one party, that is a legal issue. I could fix it just extending parties. - Invoice types must be coded on this way ( There are 19 different taxable documents but we could start with this 4): CODE| Description | Document Name ======================================= * 01 | FACTURA | 380 * 03 | BOLETA DE VENTA | 346 * 07 | NOTA DE CREDITO | 381 * 08 | NOTA DE DEBITO | 383 THat is my issues, I have it clear on my side, extend the invoice witha relation ship restriction on the party document type, however I dont want to break trytonic way. That is teh reason on asking the a suggest > > > As explained on before, I am using just a difference on the printing, > and I > > use a extra field like "Invoice document type", then I could choice which > > one will be the final printing. However this is no making a real > difference > > between the parties related, since I could select a non company and use > the > > common invoice, do you make send? > > This will be solved by using the same layout. > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: [email protected] > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tryton" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/tryton/20161204113420.GF71015%40tetsuo. > -- Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto Senior Software Developer Claro RPC +51 989550602 GTalk: [email protected] | Skype: csotelop GNULinux RU #379182 | GNULinux RM #277661 Please consider the environment before printing this email Join the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/CAEhw%3DE-x0GZKPykC34MaVJq6ZtLqVOv4TiLr8MfpiZ9YWqvr8Q%40mail.gmail.com.
