On Friday 28 June 2013 14:10:35 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Freitag, 28. Juni 2013 12:35:19 CEST, Kevin Krammer wrote: > >> http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones/trojita/pali/trojita.git > > > > I would still recommend to do at least the completion task > > in form of a job. > > I frankly was under the impression there was agreement on this > anyway? ALso I definitly saw some Job classes and then it's > reasonable to have a general job class and derive address and > password jobs from it. > > -> Pali? > > Cheers, > Thomas
Now I'm rewriting addressbook requests to use jobs. But I do not think that we need common interface for both addressbook and password jobs. I do not see trojita code where could be general job object needed. Everywhere I need to know if it is password or addressbook job type, so common interface for both classes is not needed... -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
