Hi Fabian, Quoting Fabian Keil (2014-10-21 12:55:21) > Manuel Gebauer <man...@myops.de> wrote: > > > Although, the greater risk in my opinion, comes from the question > > if tor operators can be seen as service providers who would be > > exempt from responsibility for transmitted information under the > > term of this law. There's no precedence to my knowledge, but > > private wireless APs are in fact not exempt from responsibility. > > Citation needed.
"Für ein schlecht gesichertes WLAN besteht Störerhaftung." BGH, Urteil v. 12.05.2010, Az. I ZR 121/08, Link: http://tlmd.in/u/1057 I cant't of course cite missing precedence concerning tor, because it is missing. > As far as precedence is concerned, I believe that all the Tor-related > raids in Germany (that I became aware of) ended with the state attorney > closing the investigation (against the Tor operator) after finally > realising that the offending traffic came through Tor. Citation needed. :) _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
