Already working on it (see https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/13421)
Will involve a lot of outreach and will need to consider lots of jurisdictions but it can be done with a few volunteers over the next few weeks I feel. I may also be proposing on trac a @torproject.org email for such things so if ISPs did want to do a little fact checking they can have an easy point of contact and also allows a central place to reach out to the ISPs. I feel a central email for such things would garner more respect than the fracture groups assigned using their own personal emails. -T On 19/10/2014 23:21, I wrote: > Thomas, > > That sounded so reasonable and persuasive that would it be a good idea to > have a formal opinion written to give to server companies early on? > > They might still be looking at the time it takes to deal with notices or > police queries but they must accept that the risks of allowing Tor are > miniscule. > Perhaps the way around the remaining deterrence is a Tor response 'centre' > for them to painlessly redirect irritations to. > > Robert > > >> >> Yes there are safe harbour provisions. > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > _______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
