Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Just a quick clarification. Did you mean to write "...Synchronizing
the *reads* will also fix problems..."?
>
If concurrent reads is the problem, then don't the reads need to be
synchronised? I thought from one of your earlier posts that the writes
were already synchronised.
Not in the 5.0.x build he's using.
Indeed. But do we need to sync the reads in 5.5.x as well or is it
enough just to do the writes? I am confused as you said concurrent
reads were the issue but syncing the writes would fix it.
Sorry if I am being dense here ;)
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
