[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-07 23:43 -------
I strongly agree with Craig, et al to error on the side of a more robust implemention by using synchronization on the side of Tomcat. I think doing otherwise would be doing a high-wire act without a net. There are too many places for a developer to miss handling the threading correctly to leave this as is.

Somehow, I cannot access bugzilla right now. DNS failure or something. Can someone close this as invalid and end this pointless debate ? Otherwise, I'll do it first thing when I have access :)

Thanks,
Rémy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to