Mark Thomas wrote:
Just a quick clarification. Did you mean to write "...Synchronizing the *reads* will also fix problems..."?
>
If concurrent reads is the problem, then don't the reads need to be synchronised? I thought from one of your earlier posts that the writes were already synchronised.
Not in the 5.0.x build he's using. Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
