DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 05:25 ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Why not keep everybody happy, simply make the session management class a > configurable option at both Server and Context level, if the TC developers > wish > to "experiment" they can configure the un-synchronized access they so desire. > Actually, the session management code *is* already configurable, albeit not trivially. You can include a <Manager> element inside your <Context> element and create a custom implementation of the Manager interface that returns session instances (probably subclassed from StandardSession) that do the locking for you. The key question remains what the default behavior should be, and/or whether there should be an easy boolean setting to turn this particular capability on or off. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
