jean-frederic clere wrote: >> As I said, for 'chuid' functionality I prefer using a direct >> call - I have most of it implemented using jk2, I'll >> finish this well before 5.0 is released. > > I prefer to have a C wrapper that start the JVM and call methods than > having the reverse.
That's perfectly fine as long as you accept that others may have different preferences :-) I agree that a C wrapper to start the VM may be better than the current .sh - but again I disagree on using JNI invocation instead of a simple exec to start the VM ( for the simple reason that Kaffe and GCJ don't support invocation - at least last time I checked ). > I have rethinked my position about the need of the daemon interfaces > specialy about the controler part and I am ready to +1 for moving the > interfaces and replace it a description of methods and classes that would > be called/instancied from a native program. But I need time (about 2 > weeks). I will try to provide a description of the features I need. If the daemon is not forcing tomcat to implement any interface - you have my -0 on the release. -- Costin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
