Costin Manolache wrote: > Remy Maucherat wrote: > > >>Henri Gomez wrote: >> >>>I wonder if a release of commons-daemon is planned. >> >>No, because promoting it to commons proper got vetoed. >>At the moment, it looks like a split between daemon and launcher will >>happen. > > > For the record - nobody can 'veto' a promotion to commons > or a release. It is a majority vote. If it gets 3 +1 and > more +1 than -1 - then it'll pass. > > I'm willing to change my vote to -0 if the API is fixed to > not require applications to implement the daemon interfaces > ( I don't like the split init any more than I did - and so > I don't plan to use it any time soon ). I remain -1 on > tomcat having dependecies on daemon, and probably -0 on > bundling daemon with tomcat. > > As I said, for 'chuid' functionality I prefer using a direct > call - I have most of it implemented using jk2, I'll > finish this well before 5.0 is released.
I prefer to have a C wrapper that start the JVM and call methods than having the reverse. I have rethinked my position about the need of the daemon interfaces specialy about the controler part and I am ready to +1 for moving the interfaces and replace it a description of methods and classes that would be called/instancied from a native program. But I need time (about 2 weeks). I will try to provide a description of the features I need. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
