Dan Milstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier,
>
> Glad to hear that you're willing/interested in integrating the mod_webapp
> protocol into mod_jk. I don't know exactly how easy it would be, but I
> think it *would* be a big win (you'd get lots of tested C code, load
> balancing for free, easy upgrade path for users, etc).
Heyhehyhey... Slow down... I said that I won't even THINK ABOUT IT until
mid-march as I have to move to the other side of the planet, and want to
have a quality release of mod_webapp before that.... :) :) :)
But we can start talking about it after that :)
> I've recently discovered that I'll have a chunk of free time in March. I'll
> try to use some of that to document/explain what is going on in the mod_jk C
> code (which I am pretty close to understanding, currently). Maybe we can
> work together then to try to support the mod_webapp protocol with mod_jk.
> BTW, I do think the mod_jk C code, for all it's initially forbidding lack of
> comments, is actually very intelligently thought out.
Well, I never understood how that thing works... You know, we old C farts
are kinda stubborn. After my "kid" mod_jserv I stopped thinking in C, and so
far it still didn't come back...
> Let's keep our eye on this going ahead.
Let's talk about it after I move to London :) :) :)
Pier
--
Pier Fumagalli <http://www.betaversion.org/> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
