> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering where to put put my energy mod_jk or mod_webapp.
I would say both :-)
Each has certain advantages, and the best solution is to combine the 2.
My preference is to add the protocol used by mod_webapp to the list of
protocols supported by mod_jk. I think that gives us the most - mod_jk is
quite stable and tested ( and ported on many platforms/web servers
). People who prefer stability can still use the Ajp12 protocol ( the most
tested ), while people wanting the latest/greatest protocol can use the
webapp protocol.
Everyone will be best served by merging the features and combining what's
best in the 2 - instead of "choosing" between them.
( BTW, the C side has little to do with the Java side - mod_jk + webapp
can be used with whatever version of tomcat you like - all versions of
tomcat will benefit of the improvements in the C side )
Costin
( BTW, I keep repeating that - the only way to get out of the current
situation is to merge what's best. That should be the main goal if
we want to move forward as a community - but that's a different story. )
>
> Looking the repositories I have found the following:
>
> ./jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache1.3/mod_jk.c
> ./jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0/mod_jk.c
> ./jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jserv/mod_jserv.c
> ./jakarta-tomcat-4.1/connectors/apache-1.3/mod_webapp.c
> ./jakarta-tomcat-4.0/connectors/apache-1.3/mod_webapp.c
>
> Does this means that tomcat-4.x will use mod_webapp instead mod_jk?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jean-frederic
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Costin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
