Pier,
Glad to hear that you're willing/interested in integrating the mod_webapp
protocol into mod_jk. I don't know exactly how easy it would be, but I
think it *would* be a big win (you'd get lots of tested C code, load
balancing for free, easy upgrade path for users, etc).
I've recently discovered that I'll have a chunk of free time in March. I'll
try to use some of that to document/explain what is going on in the mod_jk C
code (which I am pretty close to understanding, currently). Maybe we can
work together then to try to support the mod_webapp protocol with mod_jk.
BTW, I do think the mod_jk C code, for all it's initially forbidding lack of
comments, is actually very intelligently thought out.
Let's keep our eye on this going ahead.
-Dan
> The protocol has been designed especially for solving webapp-related issues,
> and its implementation can be easily (???) done in JK, but I never
> understood that code at all. Right now I want to have a "final release" of
> WebApp before March the 10th (as I'll be returning to Europe shortly after
> that). After that, I'll be more than happy to consider anything, but right
> now I have only 6 weeks and a lot of stuff to write :) :) :)
>
> Pier
>
> --
> Pier Fumagalli <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm selling my Sony Vaio Z505. Check out <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Dan Milstein // [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
