I will look at the diff tomorrow, but I don't see why we need an option. If you enable focusing in your terminal, you'll get it in tmux (if the application has turned it on). That's what you want, right?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:43:35AM -0800, Aaron Jensen wrote: > On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Aaron Jensen wrote: > > 3) I removed the option completely, it's not needed I don't think. > 4) akracun had added some logic to let panes track their focus status so > they couldn't ever get double notified. It's not a bad idea, but I was > worried that the same way panes would get double notified would lead > them to get their is focused flag out of sync with reality so I removed > it. I think double notify is better than not notifying, but what do you > guys think? > > I just realized why these were there in the first place and why the option > was called "focus-filter". My apologies for my confusion. Basically, if > you enable focus tracking on your external terminal via escaped control > sequences, the focus-filter would prevent those from getting to any pane > for which it is not enabled on. This is why I was seeing errant focus > tracking, because I had it enabled on iTerm as well. I'll add both of > those things back in, but add the option as a session option. Does the > option name "focus-filter" make sense to you guys? It may have just been > my mental block that prevented me from understanding what it did. > Thanks, > Aaron ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb _______________________________________________ tmux-users mailing list tmux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tmux-users
