Hiya,
On 24/02/2025 21:54, Martin Thomson wrote:
but this is a case where that interoperation already exists.
I think the above was true of your initial draft Martin, but is significantly less true of the current draft that includes an IANA registry setup with the specification required procedure - that, in addition to the addition of ECH exfiltration, means that publishing this implies that the TLS WG approve of whatever methods of exfiltration a DE approves of, and that we approve of every new thing we add to TLS (ECH in the current case) having an exfiltration method defined for it, without WG oversight. That's quite a change from the status quo ante IMO. Cheers, S. PS: It occurs to me that I never objected to this on the basis that there's been no formal analysis:-) While that's partly a joke, it does seem odd that we insist on the FATT thing for minor changes, but ignore it when busting a major hole in the entire ediface. Seems odd.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
