In the absence of a roster of participants, how can a percentage of votes be determined? We don’t have WG membership registrations, AFAIK.
Cheers, Andrei From: Quynh Dang <quyn...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 10:44 AM To: Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com> Cc: tls@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation You don't often get email from quyn...@gmail.com<mailto:quyn...@gmail.com>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 1:26 PM Tim Bray <tb...@textuality.com<mailto:tb...@textuality.com>> wrote: On Jan 15, 2025 at 11:37:58 AM, Quynh Dang <quyn...@gmail.com<mailto:quyn...@gmail.com>> wrote: Defining a minimum percentage of votes to have the consensus would take care of the problem and the chairs at the IETF would love that. No it wouldn’t Why do you think it wouldn't take care of the problem I described? Regards, Quynh. and no we (speaking as former co-chair of two WGs) wouldn’t. I’m not sure why we’re relitigating the works-pretty-OK process of consensus calls from the chair and potential appeals. -T
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
