On 02.12.24 18:38, Joseph Salowey wrote:

If you object to the adoption of this document please respond to this thread by December, 9 2024.

Based on this, I would have expected only those objecting to respond. But since those supporting the draft are also responding, so here goes my support for the draft. I fully support adoption.

I agree with Russ and John, and would look forward to the FATT review to know their opinion on whether one should include KeyUpdate and post-handshake parts in the formal models.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to