On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 15:12, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> To me, this trumps geek esthetics about making things line up. > To be clear, my objection is not aesthetic or even about implementation effort. My concern is about rubber-stamping whatever unprincipled things that NIST comes up with. I also agree that altering X25519MLKEM768 (with the now-reversed order compared to X25519Kyber768) would be silly at this point -- and I think that goes probably for the name too. Thanks, Joe
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
