>We should have a consistent ordering of [EC, PQ] in both the names and the key >schedule. I.e., the code should be >consistent with the naming and either the >EC or the PQC ought to always come first.
+1 (if FIPS leads to weird solutions, I think IETF should ignore FIPS for one of them)
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
