> There will need to be key exchange groups that are FIPS compatible, so either it will happen in this i-d, or a new one will be published.
> I'm of the opinion that it's better to have fewer codepoints to test interoperability of. > Especially if the change is completely inconsequential to people not needing FIPS compatibility. I agree with all of this. There are those who think parts of FIPS are silly. I am one of them. But "the customer is always right" and the customers often want, or have to have, FIPS. To me, this trumps geek esthetics about making things line up. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
