Hiya,
On 9/25/24 15:50, Bob Beck wrote:
If we absolutely must name the DNS thing something else,
I don't think we absolutely must change, but do think deciding now is timely, and also that a change is likely better. If we stick with what's in the I-D now, I'd say a bit of apologetic text saying why might help the DEs in agreeing to allocate a codepoint.
treat it as an opaque list of strings and don't be opinionated about what those strings contain. The DNS doesn't know or care anyway.
Sure. But the DEs do care about stability IIUC.
name it for what it's purpose is (keyshare_hint).
I like that one - as you say, naming it for what it does is good. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
