On Tue, Sep 24, 2024, at 16:11, David Benjamin wrote: > I should add, another reason to call it tls-supported-groups is that > this is essentially what the server would have put in the > supported_groups extension, if negotiation order in TLS were inverted. > Since TLS already saw fit[*] to name this concept supported_groups, I > think that's a fine name for the equivalent DNS incarnation.
This is almost a distraction, but I think that this is more realistically a set of supported KEMs, even if (EC)DH isn't strictly a KEM in the strictest sense. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
