This is done:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-rfc8446bis/

-Ekr


On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 10:30 AM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:

> Hi! Thanks to all who participated in this consensus call (and those who
> participated at IETF 120). Based on both the TLS WG sessions at IETF 120
> and this thread, the consensus is to not merge the PR.
>
> ekr - please close the PR out and submit a new version of the I-D when you
> have time.
>
> spt
>
> > On Aug 26, 2024, at 09:23, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi! Loganaden submitted a PR to add x25519 as an MTI in TLS 1.3 that
> addresses an Issue submitted by Stephen; links to both follow:
> > Issue: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1359
> > PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1360
> >
> > As this has been suggested post WGLC, we need to ensure we have
> consensus to merge this PR.  We did spend some time on this (and other
> -rfc8446bis) PRs at IETF 120.  At the session, we did a poll to 1st
> determine whether it is appropriate to make this change in this I-D, which
> > was supposed to be just for clarifications. The result of the poll was
> to not make this change. To verify this, please review the PR in its
> entirety and indicate whether you support not merging this PR by 9
> September 23:59 UTC.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > spt
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to