On 9/10/24 18:28, Sean Turner wrote:
Hi! Thanks to all who participated in this consensus call (and those who participated at IETF 120). Based on both the TLS WG sessions at IETF 120 and this thread, the consensus is to not merge the PR. ekr - please close the PR out and submit a new version of the I-D when you have time.
FWIW, I think that's the wrong outcome but is the consensus. They sky won't fall though, so no worries. Cheers, S. PS: Can we see the ECH spec published now too? I'd consider that an overdue "win" :-)
sptOn Aug 26, 2024, at 09:23, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: Hi! Loganaden submitted a PR to add x25519 as an MTI in TLS 1.3 that addresses an Issue submitted by Stephen; links to both follow: Issue: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1359 PR: https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1360 As this has been suggested post WGLC, we need to ensure we have consensus to merge this PR. We did spend some time on this (and other -rfc8446bis) PRs at IETF 120. At the session, we did a poll to 1st determine whether it is appropriate to make this change in this I-D, which was supposed to be just for clarifications. The result of the poll was to not make this change. To verify this, please review the PR in its entirety and indicate whether you support not merging this PR by 9 September 23:59 UTC. Cheers, spt_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
