> The attitude I am trying to get away from is that the TLS WG has to be involved in every extension to TLS. Rather, we should decide what things are important and spend time on them and then let others extend TLS independently in areas we don't think are important.
This is probably a worthwhile goal, but it will of course take a while to get there. It will help everyone when we can write down the criteria for knowing when something should be in the WG and when it should not. It is probably safest to still encourage the WG to look at things, and as we build up a body of knowledge we can draw conclusions. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
