I'd like to see this problem solved. There was some discussion about whether an I-D is needed or all we needed was to register a code point somewhere. If most agree that an I-D is needed, then let's adopt it. I'm happy to review.
Chris P. On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:22 PM Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > At the IETF 119 TLS session there was some interest in the mTLS Flag I-D ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jhoyla-req-mtls-flag/); also, see > previous list discussions at [0]. This message is to judge consensus on > whether there is sufficient support to adopt this I-D. If you support > adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a > message to the list. If you do not support adoption of this I-D, please > send a message to the list and indicate why. This call will close on 16 > April 2024. > > Thanks, > Deirdre, Joe, and Sean > > [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9e2S95H9YgtHp5HhqdlNqmQP0_w/ > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
