>On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, at 15:30, Eric Rescorla wrote: >> In the interest of clarity, I favor the WG declining to work on >> extending TLS 1.2, so these cipher suites should be marked as >> Recommended=No. I'm just concerned that closing the registries entirely >> will not have the best results. > > This is also my view. It would be a shame to embark on another attempt > to use registry policies to control implementations, in defiance of > everything we've learned about that not working.
I concur. (Except that I'd pick a word stronger and more descriptive than "shame". ;)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
