Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > I do however wonder why this requires a draft formalising the stance? > [...] > Is the draft actually necessary?
It is a good way to avoid continually discussing the matter. So, yes, it will save time: by documenting IETF consensus. thanks, Rob PS - I have to say, not in this message, but sometimes it seems like the goal of TLS 1.2 advocates is weaker encryption. So, for them, the flaws in TLS 1.2 that the draft describes are desirable. If that's the case, participants are not working toward the same goal. Writing down the consensus seems worth it.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
