If the draft to deprecate 1.0 and 1.1 becomes an RFC while this is still a draft, I'll remove all mention of 1.0/1.1.
> On Mar 8, 2021, at 8:34 AM, John Mattsson > <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > +1 for forbidding more old crap. > > Lack of forward secrecy should imply at least NOT RECOMMENDED. > > Does it make sense to forbid things for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 when we soon have > an RFC forbidding use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1? > > Cheers, > John > > > -----Original Message----- > From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Martin Thomson > <m...@lowentropy.net> > Date: Monday, 8 March 2021 at 16:34 > To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org> > Subject: [TLS] Regarding draft-bartle-tls-deprecate-ffdhe > > Well overdue. We should do this. > > The title "Deprecating FFDH(E) Ciphersuites in TLS" doesn't seem to match the > document content. I only see static or semi-static DH and ECDH key exchange > being deprecated (in the document as non-ephemeral). > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
