+1 for forbidding more old crap.

Lack of forward secrecy should imply at least NOT RECOMMENDED.

Does it make sense to forbid things for TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 when we soon have 
an RFC forbidding use of TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1?

Cheers,
John


-----Original Message-----
From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Martin Thomson 
<m...@lowentropy.net>
Date: Monday, 8 March 2021 at 16:34
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: [TLS] Regarding draft-bartle-tls-deprecate-ffdhe

Well overdue.  We should do this.

The title "Deprecating FFDH(E) Ciphersuites in TLS" doesn't seem to match the 
document content.  I only see static or semi-static DH and ECDH key exchange 
being deprecated (in the document as non-ephemeral).

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to