I support adoption of this draft, but as a consumer of SSL certificates which have *17* wildcards on one certificate, I feel that the handling of wildcard DNS records in this draft needs some more thought.
Tim On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:22 PM, Victor Vasiliev < vasilvv=40google....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I support adoption of this draft and would be happy to review it. > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 22:18 Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > >> >> The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was the the WG should adopt >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-esni/ as a WG item. >> But, we need to confirm this on list. If you would like for this draft to >> become a WG document and you are willing to review it as it moves through >> the process, then please let the list know by 2359UTC 20180807. If you are >> opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). >> >> Note that the draft has been marked as a "Candidate for WG Adoption” in >> the datatracker. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> TLS@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
