+1 – there are certainly kinks to work out, but this is a worthwhile direction.
From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Patrick McManus Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:23 AM To: Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> Cc: <tls@ietf.org> <tls@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-rescorla-tls-esni I support adoption of this document and I will review and provide contributions to it as it evolves in the WG - its important work. -Patrick On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:16 PM, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net<mailto:j...@salowey.net>> wrote: The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was the the WG should adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-esni/ as a WG item. But, we need to confirm this on list. If you would like for this draft to become a WG document and you are willing to review it as it moves through the process, then please let the list know by 2359UTC 20180807. If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). Note that the draft has been marked as a "Candidate for WG Adoption” in the datatracker. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org<mailto:TLS@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
