+1. I support adoption and will review. -- Christian Huitema
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Mike Bishop <mbis...@evequefou.be> wrote: > > +1 – there are certainly kinks to work out, but this is a worthwhile > direction. > > From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Patrick McManus > Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 8:23 AM > To: Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> > Cc: <tls@ietf.org> <tls@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-rescorla-tls-esni > > I support adoption of this document and I will review and provide > contributions to it as it evolves in the WG - its important work. > > -Patrick > > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:16 PM, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > > The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was the the WG should adopt > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-esni/ as a WG item. But, > we need to confirm this on list. If you would like for this draft to become > a WG document and you are willing to review it as it moves through the > process, then please let the list know by 2359UTC 20180807. If you are > opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). > > Note that the draft has been marked as a "Candidate for WG Adoption” in the > datatracker. > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
