Thanks for the feed backs. I have found two occurrences of perfect forward secrecy which have been changed to forward secrecy. Yours, Daniel
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > > > On May 18, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > I don't much care, but we've moved to "forward secrecy" in TLS 1.3. > > That's increasingly the more appropriate term. Yes, historically > the word "perfect" was there too, but these days we understand that > it is only as perfect as the ephemeral key-agreement algorithm, > which is vulnerable to cryptanalytic advances. > > -- > Viktor. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
