Hi,

> On 06 Jun 2016, at 21:05, Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> 
> TLS-LTS, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gutmann-tls-lts-03, has more or
> less stabilised, incorporating all the feedback I've had for it (there's only
> one open question still remaining), so I'd like to request that it now be
> adopted as a WG item.
> 
> I'd also like to request an early/temporary assignment for an extension ID, to
> provide something a bit more usable than the much-overloaded 0x42 that's
> currently being used.

Although I appreciate the effort, I have to agree with previous comments: we're 
working on TLS 1.3 -- I do not support the adoption of this draft.

Aaron

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to