Peter:

I skimmed this draft.  It is not just a profile of TLS 1.2.  It makes TLS 1.2 
protocol changes.

I do not think the TLS WG should take on any document that makes changes to the 
TLS 1.2 protocol.

Russ



On Jun 6, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:

> TLS-LTS, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gutmann-tls-lts-03, has more or
> less stabilised, incorporating all the feedback I've had for it (there's only
> one open question still remaining), so I'd like to request that it now be
> adopted as a WG item.
> 
> I'd also like to request an early/temporary assignment for an extension ID, to
> provide something a bit more usable than the much-overloaded 0x42 that's
> currently being used.
> 
> Peter.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to