Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> writes: > Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> writes: > > >to be pedantic, the RFC describes itself "a profile" while in reality it > >modifies the protocol in a way that will make it incompatible with "vanilla" > >TLS 1.2 implementations > > Oh, right. Well that's easily fixed, I used "profile" because I > couldn't think of a better term, the best I could come up with is > "plan", but it's not really a plan either. If people think "plan" > is better than "profile", and it deals with Russ' objection, I'll > change it to that. Alternatively, if you can think of a better term > than "plan", let me know (or forever hold your peace :-).
I think an appropriate title might be The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2.1 Update because that's what this is, isn't it? It's a new version of the protocol with minor but significant changes. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
