On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 07:36:50 am Martin Thomson wrote: > On 22 July 2015 at 02:29, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > PR at > > https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis.xml > > ? > > https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/pull/6
Could the cipher suite names be officially changed to add the 'E' to them? It'd make things simpler to be consistent. e.g. TLS_ECDH_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA => TLS_ECDHE_anon_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA Anon is ephemeral by nature, but putting the 'E' in there matches existing notation better. TLS 1.3 will be deprecating all ECDH in favor of ECDHE, so it would be nice to not have to always stick in side notes that ECDH_anon==ECDHE_anon. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
