>> I have never understood why 4492 doesn't claim forward secrecy for >> ECDH_anon suites. Can someone explain why this doesn't have an 'E’? > > I wasn’t there for the original 4492, but I think it’s because the old > anonymous ciphersuites were called DH_anon (no E). > > They both provide forward secrecy.
This is very confusing … _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
