On Jul 22, 2015, at 10:44 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have never understood why 4492 doesn't claim forward secrecy for > ECDH_anon suites. Can someone explain why this doesn't have an 'E’? I wasn’t there for the original 4492, but I think it’s because the old anonymous ciphersuites were called DH_anon (no E). They both provide forward secrecy. Yoav _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
