Am Tue, 28 Jan 2020 16:47:05 -0600 schrieb jim smith <n0...@sbcglobal.net>:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 20:13:04 +0100 > Thomas Beierlein <dl1...@darc.de> wrote: > > > Ok, That would only extend the functionality of CHANGE_RST. If > > changing only the first two numbers are enough that would be the > > most easy solution. If key auto repeat does also work for PgUp/PgDn > > (needs to be tested) you need not to much key presses to sweep over > > the range. > > > > Jim, would that solve your needs? If so it can be implemented in > > next weeks. > > I think so. And in any case, I think defer to "make it easiest for > the 'Run' operator. If the S&P op has to make a few more keypresses > to get things done, that's fine. Also, that final 9 can alwasy be 9 > in RST, IMO. OK, we will add it to the ToDO list then. > > > > Probably the reason this hasn't been requested before is that > > > major contest sponsors mostly ignore the signal report for log > > > checking. > > > > And in contest we ignore the 'real' RST value from the band and stay > > with 5nn to make more contacts per time. > > > > 73, de Tom > > I agree with that -- in most contests the RS(T) is a given. But for > QRP and especially SOTA operations (where I would *really* like to use > tlf), it would be most helpful to be able to type in the R and S of > RST. > > Thanks to all for considering this. I used tlf in last weekend's > CQ160m contest, and it never missed a beat. *I* did, but it did not. Good to hear :-). 73, de Tom -- "Do what is needful!" Ursula LeGuin: Earthsea --
