On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 20:13:04 +0100 Thomas Beierlein <dl1...@darc.de> wrote: > Ok, That would only extend the functionality of CHANGE_RST. If > changing only the first two numbers are enough that would be the most > easy solution. If key auto repeat does also work for PgUp/PgDn (needs > to be tested) you need not to much key presses to sweep over the > range. > > Jim, would that solve your needs? If so it can be implemented in next > weeks.
I think so. And in any case, I think defer to "make it easiest for the 'Run' operator. If the S&P op has to make a few more keypresses to get things done, that's fine. Also, that final 9 can alwasy be 9 in RST, IMO. > > Probably the reason this hasn't been requested before is that major > > contest sponsors mostly ignore the signal report for log checking. > > And in contest we ignore the 'real' RST value from the band and stay > with 5nn to make more contacts per time. > > 73, de Tom I agree with that -- in most contests the RS(T) is a given. But for QRP and especially SOTA operations (where I would *really* like to use tlf), it would be most helpful to be able to type in the R and S of RST. Thanks to all for considering this. I used tlf in last weekend's CQ160m contest, and it never missed a beat. *I* did, but it did not. 73, Jim KK0U
