Hi Tony,
Actually, I do use "TiddlyWiki for Firefox 2.0.2-prerelease" on "Waterfox
Classic 2020.03.01" for dedicated TiddlyWiki matters, especially TW5.
I even use the old "Firefox 3.6.36" (no extension required) due to TWC
compatibility to old plugins (I have a couple of TWC's that cannot be
upgraded to TW5 though I use them on a daily basis).
I also use Timimi on both Firefox and Chrome.
However I have to stick with Waterfox Classic (WFC) for a couple of reasons:
1) I cannot install any program at all in my office computer due to
security issues; we do not have administrative rights.
2) I want to keep all my TW related bookmarks in one browser (over one
hundred).
Therefore, I use a regular WFC at home and a WFC portable running from an
USB at the office. Probably not the most elegant solution though problem
solved.
Having explained the above, IMHO we should recommend, especially to the new
people looking into TW, one or two saving options only. Having too many
options to choose is not beneficial to the newcomer ("what, do you want me
to try all these options? Do I have the time?"). The option described above
should be an exception to the rule for people working in office
environments with no administrative rights.
Regards,
Alfonso
On Saturday, May 2, 2020 at 7:49:50 PM UTC-6, TonyM wrote:
>
> To all,
>
> Does anyone really use tiddlyfox in a backdated version of the browser
> rather than use the new superior Timimi ?
>
> The minimum reference to the apocalypse, which we recovered from, we are
> "post apocalypse", would be wise, I am always needing to tell people about
> Timimi because "tiddlyfox" misleads.
>
> Regards
> Tony
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3369b6f6-fe00-4079-823a-fae544f0ce20%40googlegroups.com.
