> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 03:09:49 +0100 > Jindrich Novy <jn...@redhat.com> wrote: > > So to make all clear it is just a TL2012 preview > release not recommended for production. > > This is how we have done it since TL2010. > > Jindrich
Mojca, thank you very much to bring this discussion, and to Jindrich for his feedback. This is extremely informative from my modest point of view. I am an end user (possibly the only one along the list), and I had some hard time to understand the difference between the Fedora & CTAN Texlive packages, ever since I begun to use LyX, and got intrigued by LaTeX. You will forgive a novice question along this discussion; I am in the process of learning LaTeX now, and it would be a worry less, if I could focus on the features, and not have to worry about the package, or it's dependencies. I already encountered some dependencies problems with the Jindrich package (I now understand why, at the light of this discussion) and I did not manage too well a manual install of the CTAN Texlive either (to my dismay). So, in short: Will there be a stable F-Texlive version 201n, to replace the 2007 version I am currently using. And how do I know that's the one? Is it going to be distribution number related (e.g. Fedrora 17 or 18) or package number (eg. Texlive 2012-final)? Thanks again. -- nomnex <nom...@gmail.com> Freenode: nomnex Registered Linux user #505281. Be counted at: http://linuxcounter.net _______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list TeXLive@linux.cz http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
