> A real waste of processor cycles?? How so?? you make it sound as if > running a driver for a winmodem is not a good thing to do, could you > please explain? I suspect that this was meant to disparage winmodems, not the Linux drivers. I tend to agree, since the cost savings aren't that much anyway it makes sense to me to spend the extra on a "real" modem and not have to thrash your CPU every time you need to go online, although I haven't looked at any performance figures for winmodems I imagine the CPU hit would be quite high. Yours, Ian. #ifndef __COMMON_SENSE__ | Ian Phillips #include <std_disclaimer> | TIBCO Software Inc. #endif | www.TIBCO.com ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Theresa Radke
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Kir Kolyshkin
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Cynthia Dale
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Alain Toussaint
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Theresa Radke
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Theresa Radke
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Ian Phillips
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Kelly Lynn Martin
- RE: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Ian Phillips
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driv... Kelly Lynn Martin
- RE: [techtalk] winmodem sound ... Ian Phillips
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem so... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Alain Toussaint
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Chris J/#6
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Steve Kudlak
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Theresa Radke