>Ok. I thought you were saying that there's no reason for Gnome to exist
>if KDE is GPL.
[...]
>Anyway, I don't think there's any good reason to. Do you have one?
I don't have any good reasons to. I think it's a bad idea personally, and that
the competition benefits both projects.
In a previous message, you said:
--- snip ---
I don't see that. The codebases of GNOME and KDE are significantly
different such that it's not possible | worth it to merge them, and
there's no reason to toss either one of them out. It might have been
about licenses in the beginning, but there are architectural, technical,
philosophical differences. There's really not a Right Way to do these
types of things..
(btw, Qt is not GPL. It might be free, but it's not GPL. The annoying
thing about free *PLs is that they are usually incompatible with the GPL
and each other.)
--- snip ---
I mistakenly thought that these two paragraphs were talking about the same
topic, a possible merger. Now that I've read it over a few times it looks like
you were just taking issue with the original poster saying "It's now perfectly
GPL". Sorry for misunderstanding you.
TTFN
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
