Will Dennis wrote:

> Which version of SMB are we talking about here? (CIFS == pre
> SMB 1.0, i.e. the NT4.0 proto) MSFT is shipping SMB 3.02 now on
> Server 2012 R2, which is extremely high-performance (so much so
> that they allow SQL Server DB file access as well as Hyper-V VM
> file access over SMB 3.x as an alternative to iSCSI or FC
> connections...)

Great question. (BTW, SMB and CIFS are often used interchangably 
by Microsoft. Their definitive protocol specs (MS-CIFS, MS-SMB,
and MS-SMB2) sanction interchangable usage. I haven't read MS-SMB3.)

> Please see
> http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2013/10/02/windows-server-2012-r2-which-version-of-the-smb-protocol-smb-1-0-smb-2-0-smb-2-1-smb-3-0-or-smb-3-02-you-are-using.aspx
> for further details on versions and history.

> Please also take a look at
> http://blog.fosketts.net/2012/05/06/smb-3-huge-scope-impact/ for
> Stephen Foskett's take on SMB 3.0 (Stephen is a storage expert,
> independent blogger, and runs Storage Field Day as a part of his
> Tech Field Day series...)

> Facts, not FUD, please.

I'm merely reporting my own experience on a large heterogenous
net with actual servers and clients using these protocols in
production. In the right environment with the right clients and
servers, SMB 3 probably rocks. However, I was responding to a
comment (which you trimmed) about CIFS performance in general,
which I expanded on. 

The Foskett article cited (I happen to be a Foskett fan) has a
lot of superlatives, was written prior to the product release,
and appears to be based entirely on product claims -- not
observed performance. He could be right, but I wouldn't call my
observations FUD, especially not while referencing Foskett's
hype!

> (note that the above does not speak to the OP's original q on
> NFS on Win2012R2, and suggestions to consider SMB instead - just
> trying to make the point that SMB is a performant proto vs. NFS
> these days...)


_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to