Which version of SMB are we talking about here? (CIFS == pre SMB 1.0, i.e. the 
NT4.0 proto) MSFT is shipping SMB 3.02 now on Server 2012 R2, which is 
extremely high-performance (so much so that they allow SQL Server DB file 
access as well as Hyper-V VM file access over SMB 3.x as an alternative to 
iSCSI or FC connections...)

Please see 
http://blogs.technet.com/b/josebda/archive/2013/10/02/windows-server-2012-r2-which-version-of-the-smb-protocol-smb-1-0-smb-2-0-smb-2-1-smb-3-0-or-smb-3-02-you-are-using.aspx
 for further details on versions and history.

Please also take a look at 
http://blog.fosketts.net/2012/05/06/smb-3-huge-scope-impact/ for Stephen 
Foskett's take on SMB 3.0 (Stephen is a storage expert, independent blogger, 
and runs Storage Field Day as a part of his Tech Field Day series...)

Facts, not FUD, please.

(note that the above does not speak to the OP's original q on NFS on Win2012R2, 
and suggestions to consider SMB instead - just trying to make the point that 
SMB is a performant proto vs. NFS these days...)

- Will

-----Original Message-----
From: tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org [mailto:tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org] On 
Behalf Of Charles Polisher
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:20 AM
To: Tim Kirby
Cc: LOPSA Tech
Subject: Re: [lopsa-tech] MS Windows as NFS Server?

Tim Kirby wrote:
> CIFS is not generally cited as a performance protocol.

Having spent quality time with a packet sniffer in one hand and the protocol 
specs in the other I can confirm that with typical SBO usage Microsoft SMB/CIFS 
has terrible performance. But, evaluate alternatives in light of training and 
support burdens.

HTH,
--
Charles Polisher

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators  
http://lopsa.org/
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to