a big problem with tapestry is that not many employers are using it . Many times I hear people arguing that it's not the right thing to learn because there's no jobs for it .
On 3/22/06, Dan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's interesting that struts got more votes than JSF. Knowing > the amount of code it takes to do anything in JSF I might tend to agree. > But still, struts? > > On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:50 -0800, Konstantin Ignatyev wrote: > > Just want to share: > > last night here at Seattle Java User group we had a round table > > discussion where people were presenting WEB UI frameworks they use and > > tried to highlight things they love about them. There were many: > > Millstone, Barracuda, echo2, JSF, Struts, Tapestry, Tiles/Sitemesh, DWR, > > RubyOnRails > > Every presenter had about 6-8 minutes for a "sales pitch" and at the end > > people answered the question: > > If you were a king and decide what framework to use for next project, > > which framework will you use? (People voted once only for just one > > framework) > > > > Tapestry – 15; > > Struts – 5; > > JSF – 3; > > The rest got zero or 1 votes; > > I could attribute Tapestry's warm reception to my presenter skills :) > > but in reality it is the Howard's hard work and Tapestry community make the > > framework so appealing to developers. > > I ask everybody to speak about Tapestry more frequently on occasions and > > this way we all will benefit from wider Tapestry adoption. > > > > > > Konstantin Ignatyev > > -- > Dan Adams > Software Engineer > Interactive Factory > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
